From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bynum

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2012
470 F. App'x 149 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7671

04-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICE BYNUM, a/k/a Dog Boy, Defendant - Appellant.

Maurice Bynum, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Mark C. Moore, Stanley Duane Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:09-cr-00826-CMC-17)

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Bynum, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Mark C. Moore, Stanley Duane Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Maurice Bynum appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bynum, No. 3:09-cr-00826-CMC-17 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Bynum

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2012
470 F. App'x 149 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bynum

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICE BYNUM, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

470 F. App'x 149 (4th Cir. 2012)