From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Burrell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2022
21 Cr. 663 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2022)

Opinion

21 Cr. 663 (LAK)

09-20-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSHUA BURRELL, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Daniel Loss Alexander Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorneys JOSHUA BURRELL Todd A. Spodek,


DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York

Daniel Loss Alexander Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorneys

JOSHUA BURRELL Todd A. Spodek,

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE ELEWIS A. KAPLAN UNITED STATES DISTTUCT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about November 1, 2021, JOSHUA BURRELL (the “Defendant”), was charged in a three-count indictment, 21 Cr. 663 (LAK) (the “Indictment”), with securities fraud, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78(b) and 78ff, Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2 (Count One); wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2 (Count Two); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A and 2 (Count Three);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, of any and all property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, on or about April 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Indictment, and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, a sum of money equal to $107,688 in United States currency, representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $ 107,688 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorneys Daniel Loss and Alexander Rossmiller, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Todd A. Spodek, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $107,688 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant JOSHUA BURRELL, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

AGREED AND CONSENTED TO;

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Burrell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2022
21 Cr. 663 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Burrell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSHUA BURRELL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 20, 2022

Citations

21 Cr. 663 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2022)