From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Burnside

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2015
623 F. App'x 85 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6851

11-24-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID BURNSIDE, Defendant - Appellant.

David Burnside, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00586-RDB-1; 1:15-cv-00020-RDB) Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Burnside, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Burnside seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burnside has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Burnside

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2015
623 F. App'x 85 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Burnside

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID BURNSIDE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 85 (4th Cir. 2015)