From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Burgess

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 12, 2013
546 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7046

11-12-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FREDERICK FRISALYN BURGESS, Defendant - Appellant.

Frederick Frisalyn Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8) Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Frisalyn Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Frisalyn Burgess appeals the district court's text order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8 (D.S.C. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Burgess

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 12, 2013
546 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Burgess

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FREDERICK FRISALYN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 12, 2013

Citations

546 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2013)