From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Burgandy Oldsmobile Cutlas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Jan 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-2469 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-2469

01-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. A Burgundy Oldsmobile Cutlass, VIN: 342671M203628, and A Silver Chevrolet Impala, VIN 164698D145683 Defendants In Rem,


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

The Plaintiff, United States of America, has moved to dismiss this case without prejudice, On January 23,2012, the vehicles constituting the defendants in rem in this civil forfeiture action were criminally forfeited in the case of United States v. Lamatavous Regtez Collins, Cr. No. 1:10-466 (Entry 966). The criminal forfeiture of the vehicles renders this civil forfeiture action moot.

Accordingly, it is ordered that this civil action is dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ, Pro.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Terry L. Wooten

United States District Judge
Florence, South Carolina
January 25, 2012


Summaries of

United States v. Burgandy Oldsmobile Cutlas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Jan 25, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-2469 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Burgandy Oldsmobile Cutlas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. A Burgundy Oldsmobile Cutlass…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-2469 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2012)