From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bullock

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 23, 2023
CRIM. 21-900 (D.N.J. Feb. 23, 2023)

Opinion

CRIM. 21-900

02-23-2023

UNITED STATES v. ISAIAH BULLOCK


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCING

HONORABLE SUSAN D. WIGENTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Bullock

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 23, 2023
CRIM. 21-900 (D.N.J. Feb. 23, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Bullock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. ISAIAH BULLOCK

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 23, 2023

Citations

CRIM. 21-900 (D.N.J. Feb. 23, 2023)