From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Buege

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 21, 1935
74 F.2d 1021 (9th Cir. 1935)

Opinion

No. 7567.

January 21, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Idaho, Eastern Division.

John A. Carver, U.S. Atty., of Boise, Idaho, Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D.C., Wilbur C. Pickett, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Armistead L. Boothe, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C.

Jess Hawley and Oscar W. Worthwine, both of Boise, Idaho, for appellee.

Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.


This is an action upon a war risk insurance policy. The trial court erred in the ruling upon the admissibility of expert testimony upon the question of total and permanent disability. It is conceded on the argument that the rulings come squarely within our decision in United States v. Stephens, 73 F.2d 695, rendered November 13, 1934. See, also, recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Spaulding, 55 S. Ct. 273, 79 L. Ed. ___, decided January 7, 1935.

For this error the judgment is reversed.


Summaries of

United States v. Buege

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 21, 1935
74 F.2d 1021 (9th Cir. 1935)
Case details for

United States v. Buege

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Adolph E. BUEGE, Appellee

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 21, 1935

Citations

74 F.2d 1021 (9th Cir. 1935)