From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Buckland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Apr 13, 2015
CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-15 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 13, 2015)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-15

04-13-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN BUCKLAND, Defendant.


()

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OPINION/REPORT RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

On April 2, 2015, defendant, Ryan Buckland ("Buckland"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Fifty-Eight of the Indictment. Buckland stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, and consented to pleading before the magistrate judge. This Court had referred the guilty plea to the magistrate judge for the purposes of administering the allocution pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.

Based upon Buckland's statements during the plea hearing and the testimony of Sergeant John Rogers of the West Virginia State Police, the magistrate judge found that Buckland was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. On April 3, 2015, the magistrate judge entered an Opinion/Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") (dkt. no. 350) finding a factual basis for the plea and recommended that this Court accept Buckland's plea of guilty to Count Fifty-Eight of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. The magistrate judge further directed that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. After which, the parties did not file any objections.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R, ACCEPTS Buckland's guilty plea, and ADJUGES him GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Fifty-Eight of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Probation Officer undertake a presentence investigation of RYAN BUCKLAND, and prepare a presentence report for the Court;

2. The Government and Buckland are to provide their versions of the offense to the probation officer by April 27, 2015;

3. The presentence report is to be disclosed to Buckland, defense counsel, and the United States on or before June 12, 2015; however, the Probation Officer is not to disclose the sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence report on or before June 26, 2015;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence report with addendum to the Court on or before July 10, 2015; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis from the statements or motions, on or before July 24, 2015.

The magistrate judge remanded Buckland to the custody of the United States Marshal Service.

The Court will conduct the sentencing hearing for the defendant on Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 11:30 A.M. at the Clarksburg, West Virginia point of holding court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record, the defendant and all appropriate agencies. DATED: April 13, 2015

/s/ Irene M. Keeley

IRENE M. KEELEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Buckland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Apr 13, 2015
CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-15 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 13, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Buckland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN BUCKLAND, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Date published: Apr 13, 2015

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-15 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 13, 2015)