From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bucio-Lachino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2012
Case Number: 10CR1312-GT (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 10CR1312-GT

11-08-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO FROYLAN BUCIO-LACHINO (1)

KURT DAVID HERMANSEN Defendant's Attorney


JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

(For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)

(For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

KURT DAVID HERMANSEN

Defendant's Attorney
REGISTRATION No. 7314098 [ ]

THE DEFENDANT:

[X] admitted guilt to violation of allegation(s) No. ONE [ ] was found in violation of allegation(s) No. ___________ alter denial of guilt. ACCORDINGLY, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is guilt) of the following allegation(s):

+-------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Allegation Number¦Nature of Violation ¦ +-----------------+-------------------------------------------¦ ¦1 ¦Committed a federal, state or local offense¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------+

Supervised Release is revoked and the defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. This sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all tines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant's economic circumstances.

NOVEMBER 8, 2012

Date of Imposition of Sentence

___________

HON. GORDON THOMPSON, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of

EIGHT (8) MONTHS CONSECUTIVE TO ANY OTHER SENTENCE NOW BEING SERVED.
[ ] The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: [ ] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. [ ] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

[ ] at ___________ [ ] a.m. [ ] p.m. on ___________.
as notified by the United States Marshal.
[ ] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:
[ ] before ___________
[ ] as notified b) the United States Marshal.
[ ] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on ___________ to ___________ at ___________, with a certified copy of this judgment.

___________

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

By ___________

DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL


Summaries of

United States v. Bucio-Lachino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2012
Case Number: 10CR1312-GT (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bucio-Lachino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO FROYLAN BUCIO-LACHINO (1)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 8, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 10CR1312-GT (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2012)