Opinion
6:24-cr-67-JA-LHP
11-25-2024
ORDER
JOHN ANTOON II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Government's motion in limine to preclude Defendant's evidence or argument regarding ignorance or mistake of law (Doc. 61), the defendant's motion in limine to limit impeachment evidence (Doc. 67), and the defendant's motion in limine to exclude the Government's Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) evidence (Doc. 68). Also, the Government objected to the defendant s request for judicial notice. (Doc. 60). And the defendant requested a special instruction as to the offense. (Doc. 58 at 30-31; Doc. 62). As stated by the Court on November 14th and 15th, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Government's motion in limine to preclude Defendant's argument or evidence argument regarding ignorance or mistake of law (Doc. 61) is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion in limine to limit impeachment evidence (Doc. 67) is DENIED as moot based on the parties' stipulation.
3. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude the Government's Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) evidence (Doc. 68) is DENIED.
4. Government's objection to the defendant's request for judicial notice (Doc. 52, Doc. 60) is well-taken, and thus the defendant's request for judicial notice is DENIED.
5. Defendant's request for a special instruction (Doc. 58 at 30-31; Doc. 62) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.