From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 9, 2012
Criminal No. 3:08CR313-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 3:08CR313-HEH

10-09-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMMY O. BROWN, Petitioner.


ORDER

(Accepting Report and Recommendation

and Denying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion)

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: the Report and Recommendation (Dk. No. 75) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED; Claim 1 is DISMISSED; the motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dk. No. 47) is DENIED; the Motion for Leave to File (Dk. No. 65) is DENIED; the action is DISMISSED; and a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Brown may appeal the decision of the Court. Should he wish to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a timely notice of appeal may result in the loss of the ability to appeal.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Brown and counsel of record.

It is SO ORDERED.

___________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: Oct 5, 2012
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 9, 2012
Criminal No. 3:08CR313-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMMY O. BROWN, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 9, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 3:08CR313-HEH (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ebron v. Brown

But these submissions do not demonstrate that Ebron ever requested a copy of his PSR from his attorney, that…