From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Apr 1, 2013
Case No. 7:12-CR-4 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 7:12-CR-4 (HL)

04-01-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. QUENTALIN S. BROWN, Defendant.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 101) and Amended Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 102). Both motions are denied because counsel has failed to comply with the requirements of Local Criminal Rule 57(d)(3), which governs a request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis when the defendant is represented by retained counsel. The Court also refers counsel to Local Criminal Rule 57(d)(1), which sets forth the Court's expectation that retained counsel "shall make fee and other necessary financial arrangements satisfactory to themselves and sufficient to provide for representation of the client until the conclusion of the client's case." A client's case is not concluded until his direct appeal is decided. M.D. Ga. L. Crim. R. 57(d)(1).

_________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Apr 1, 2013
Case No. 7:12-CR-4 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 1, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. QUENTALIN S. BROWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. 7:12-CR-4 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 1, 2013)