Opinion
22-7127
03-21-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER DONNELL BROWN, a/k/a Stymie, a/k/a Stimey, Defendant-Appellant.
Christopher Donnell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 16, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-00350-JFA-1)
Christopher Donnell Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Donnell Brown appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to correct a clerical error in his presentence report and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:17-cr-00350-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2022; Sept. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED