From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2022
3:20-cr-415-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cr-415-MOC-DCK-1

11-18-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARISSA EUGENIA BROWN, Defendant.


ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se “Motion to Dismiss” under 43 CFR § 4.1169. (Doc. No. 69).

The ground on which Defendant seeks dismissal is wholly meritless. Defendant has filed their Motion to Dismiss under 43 CFR § 4.1169 - a rule of the Code of Federal Regulations which pertains to administrative law judges, not Article III judges. The Code of Federal Regulations is inapposite in this criminal matter. This is a criminal case, and the jurisdictional inquiry is governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. In any event, Defendant's argument that this case should be dismissed for failure to state a claim is inapplicable and baseless.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's pro se Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 69) is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2022
3:20-cr-415-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARISSA EUGENIA BROWN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Nov 18, 2022

Citations

3:20-cr-415-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2022)