From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2019
No. 19-7159 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-7159

12-20-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KAREEM BROWN, Defendant - Appellant.

Kareem Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:17-cr-00113-MSD-RJK-1) Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kareem Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kareem Brown appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an extension of time to appeal his criminal judgment. Upon review, we conclude that the district court correctly determined that it was unable to extend the time for filing a timely notice of appeal of the criminal judgment because Brown filed his motion after the expiration of the excusable neglect period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 4:17-cr-00113-MSD-RJK-1 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2019
No. 19-7159 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KAREEM BROWN, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

No. 19-7159 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)