From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 16, 2019
Case No. 92-CR-81127 (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 92-CR-81127

05-16-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GREGORY BROWN, Defendant/Petitioner.


ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION OBJECTING TO GOVERNMENT'S FILING OF UNAUTHORIZED JOINT § 2255 RESPONSE (Doc. 2367) AND SETTING NEW DATE FOR BROWN'S REPLY BRIEF

I.

This is a criminal case. In 1997, defendant/petitioner Gregory Brown (Brown) was convicted by a jury of (1) conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and § 841(a)(1), (2) intentional killing, aiding and abetting, in furtherance of a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE), in violation of 21. U.S.C. § 848(e)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and (3) using or carrying a firearm in relation to a drug offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Brown was sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed his conviction and sentence. United States v. Brown, No. 97-1618, 2000 WL 876382 (June 20, 2000) (unpublished). The Supreme Court denied certiorari. Brown v. United States, No. 00-7007 (Dec. 11, 2000). The Sixth Circuit approved Brown, and three other co-defendants, to file a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to argue that they are entitled to relief under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S.C. 718 because they were sentenced to mandatory life without parole based on crimes alleged to have been committed as juveniles. See Doc. 2307.

On April 29, 2019, the government filed a combined response to all four § 2255 motions. (Doc. 2364).

Before the Court is Brown's objection to the government's combined response. The objection is DENIED. There is nothing inappropriate or improper with the government's filing. Although the government filed a single response, the government discussed each defendant separately in arguing that none of the defendants are entitled to relief.

Brown's reply was due by May 31, 2019, see Doc. 2350. However, because the government obtained an extension of time to file its response, Brown's reply is now due on or before June 28, 2019, the same date that replies are due from his co-defendants.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: 5/16/2019

Detroit, Michigan


Summaries of

United States v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 16, 2019
Case No. 92-CR-81127 (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GREGORY BROWN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2019

Citations

Case No. 92-CR-81127 (E.D. Mich. May. 16, 2019)