From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 9, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cr-34 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-34

12-09-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Keith Allan Brow,


HON. R. ALLAN EDGAR


ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objections have been filed thereto within the time required by law.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and recommendation of the Magistrate filed 11/22/11 #20, is approved and adopted as the Opinion and Findings of this Court.
2. Defendant Keith Allan Brow's plea of guilty to purchasing more than 9 grams of pseudoephedrine base in a 30 day period is accepted. Defendant Keith Allan Brow is adjudicated guilty.
3. A decision of whether to accept the written plea agreement will be made at the time of sentencing after the Court has had the opportunity to review the Pre-sentence Investigation Report. See U.S.S.G. Ch. 6.

SO ORDERED.

R. ALLAN EDGAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Brow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 9, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cr-34 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 9, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Brow

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Keith Allan Brow,

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-34 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 9, 2011)