From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brock

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 20, 1972
454 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1079. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

January 20, 1972.

Daniel S. Pearson, Alan M. Medof, Pearson Josefsberg, P. A., Miami, Fla., for Stanley Brock.

Robert W. Rust, U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., James H. Walsh, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Miami, Fla., for United States, Sidney M. Glazer, Shirley Baccus-Lobel, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.



Defendant, a previously convicted felon, was indicted and convicted of willfully and knowingly possessing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a). The conviction must be reversed because the government neither alleged nor proved that the firearm was possessed "in commerce of affecting commerce," as required by the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Bass, 404 U.S. 336, 92 S.Ct. 515, 30 L.Ed.2d 488.

Reversed.


Summaries of

United States v. Brock

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 20, 1972
454 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Brock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. STANLEY BROCK, A/K/A…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 20, 1972

Citations

454 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Garcia

We are convinced by the foregoing authorities that the phrase "in commerce or affecting commerce" is an…