From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jun 24, 2016
Case No. 14-10098-JTM (D. Kan. Jun. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 14-10098-JTM

06-24-2016

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Cynthia Bright, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

In 2014, defendant Cynthia Bright was convicted of bank fraud and sentenced to 70 months imprisonment, based in part on loss calculations reflected in U.S.S.G. § 2.B.1. (Dkt. 18, at 14). The matter is before the court on Bright's motion to modify her sentence in light of amendments to § 2.B.1 adopted in 2015.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), the court can only consider Guidelines amendments which the Sentencing Commission has explicitly made retroactive. The Commission has not made the 2015 amendments to § 2B1.1 retroactive. U.S.S.G. app. C, amends. 791, 792. Indeed, the U.S. Sentencing Commission explicitly stated that the offenses committed before November 1, 2015 are governed by the previous loss tables. U.S.S.G. app. C, amend. 791. See United States v. Walker, 818 F.3d 416, 424 (8th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, the court must consider the Guidelines as they existed at the time of the original sentencing,18 U.S.C. § 3742(b)(1), and the court is thus without jurisdiction to grant the relief sought.

IT IS ACCORDINGLY ordered this 24th day of June, 2016, that the defendant's Motion for Reduction is hereby denied.

s/ J. Thomas Marten

J. THOMAS MARTEN, JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Bright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jun 24, 2016
Case No. 14-10098-JTM (D. Kan. Jun. 24, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Bright

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Cynthia Bright, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jun 24, 2016

Citations

Case No. 14-10098-JTM (D. Kan. Jun. 24, 2016)