From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Briggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Feb 19, 2016
CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-07 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 19, 2016)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-07

02-19-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KALIF BRIGGS, Defendant.


( ) ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE (DKT. NO. 685) AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

On February 4, 2016, the defendant, Kalif Briggs ("Briggs"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Twenty-Four of the Indictment. After Briggs stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, he consented to tendering his plea before the magistrate judge. Previously, this Court had referred the guilty plea to the magistrate judge for the purposes of administering the allocution pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.

Based upon Briggs' statements during the plea hearing and the testimony of John Rogers, a sergeant with the West Virginia State Police, the magistrate judge found that Briggs was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. On February 4, 2016, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") (dkt. no. 685), finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Briggs' plea of guilty to Count Twenty-Four of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. The parties did not file any objections to the R&R.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R, ACCEPTS Briggs' guilty plea, and ADJUGES him GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Twenty-Four of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Briggs and prepare a presentence report for the Court;

2. The Government and Briggs are to provide their versions of the offense to the probation officer by March 3, 2016;

3. The presentence report is to be disclosed to Briggs, defense counsel, and the United States on or before April 18, 2016; however, the Probation Officer is not to disclose the sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence report on or before May 2, 2016;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence report with addendum to the Court on or before May 16, 2016; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis from the statements or motions, on or before May 31, 2016.

The magistrate judge remanded Briggs to the custody of the United States Marshal Service.

The Court will conduct the sentencing hearing for the defendant on Tuesday, June 14, 2016, at 10:00 A.M., at the Clarksburg, West Virginia, point of holding court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record, the defendant and all appropriate agencies. DATED: February 19, 2016

/s/ Irene M. Keeley

IRENE M. KEELEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Briggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Feb 19, 2016
CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-07 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 19, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Briggs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KALIF BRIGGS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Date published: Feb 19, 2016

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:14CR89-07 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 19, 2016)