From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brierley

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 1, 1972
458 F.2d 38 (3d Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1539.

Argued April 14, 1972.

Decided May 1, 1972.

Fairfax Leary, Jr., Public Interest Group, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

James D. Crawford, Deputy Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Alfred L. Luongo, Judge.

Before McLAUGHLIN, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


We have carefully considered the contentions raised in this appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. We find them to be without merit and will affirm the order of the district court for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Alfred L. Luongo, 326 F. Supp. 364 (E.D.Pa. 1971).

The order of the district court will be affirmed.


In this "admittedly close" case on the issue of probable cause to arrest, I concur in the majority opinion relying on Judge Luongo's opinion. I compliment court-appointed counsel on his fine briefing and argument of this issue and the other issues presented by the case.

See page 368 of 326 F. Supp., where Judge Luongo also stated: "In my view the matter of probable cause is not free from doubt. . . ."


Summaries of

United States v. Brierley

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 1, 1972
458 F.2d 38 (3d Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Brierley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JOHN H. HARDY, E-2914, APPELLANT, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 1, 1972

Citations

458 F.2d 38 (3d Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Com. v. Johnson

An even more direct relationship between the unlawful search and the statement taken from appellant is…