From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Brewster

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 10, 2022
2:20-cr-00099-KJD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cr-00099-KJD-NJK

01-10-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TODD COREY BREWSTER, Defendant.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Defense counsel needs additional time with Mr. Brewster to prepare for his change of plea and presentencing issues. In addition, Mr. Brewster needs additional time to address pending state cases.

2. The defendant is incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

3. The parties agree to the continuance.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow counsel for defendant sufficient time within which to be able to effectively and complete investigation of the discovery materials provided.

5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section § 3161 (h)(7)(A), when the considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the change of plea hearing currently scheduled for Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and continued to February 15, 2022 at the hour of 9:30 a.m. by video conference.


Summaries of

United States v. Brewster

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 10, 2022
2:20-cr-00099-KJD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Brewster

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TODD COREY BREWSTER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

2:20-cr-00099-KJD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2022)