United States v. Brandon

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TARL BRANDON…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

13-10281, 13-10282, 13-10283 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2015)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TARL BRANDON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TARL BRANDON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TARL BRANDON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 13-10281, 13-10282, 13-10283 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit March 10, 2015

D.C. Nos. 2:09-cr-00494-KJD-VCF-1, 2:10-cr-00209-KJD-VCF-1, 2:10-cr-00407-KJD-GWF-1

Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on December 11, 2014 is amended as follows:

At page 2, line 23, the following citation is added:

"Eslaminia v. White, 136 F.3d 1234, 1237 & n.1 (9th Cir. 1998)"

With this amendment, the panel votes to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Ikuta votes to deny petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Noonan and Judge Fernandez recommend denying the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing and for rehearing en banc will be entertained.