From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bradley

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
21 Cr. 277 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)

Opinion

21 Cr. 277 (PAE)

05-20-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES BRADLEY, a/k/a “Abdullah, ” and ARWA MUTHANA, Defendants.


PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN CLASSIFIED DISCOVERY

HONORABLE PAUL A. ENGLEMAYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter came before the Court on the Government's motion (the "Government Motion"), exhibits, and the declarations of various Government officials (collectively, the "Government Submission"). The Government Submission was filed ex parte, in camera, and through the Classified Information Security Officer on May 16, 2022. The Government Submission sought a protective order, pursuant to Section 4 of the Classified Information Procedures Act ("CIPA") and Rule 16(d)(l) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, regarding disclosure of certain information. After ex parte, in camera consideration of the Government Submission, this Court finds:

1. That the Government Submission contains and describes classified information that requires protection against unauthorized disclosure. That information is described with particularity in the Government Submission.

2. The head of the department that has control of the classified information described in the Government Submission, after actual personal consideration, has lodged the state secrets privilege with respect to that classified information.

3. Disclosure of the "Classified Materials" as that term is defined in the Government Submission to the defense or the public could reasonably be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.

4. The Classified Materials are not discoverable under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, or Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. In addition, the Classified Materials are not helpful to the defense, that is, useful to counter the Government's case or bolster a defense, as required under United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72, 78 (2d Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, it is:

ORDERED that the Government Motion is granted, and the Classified Materials, as defined in the Government Motion and described herein, need not be disclosed to the defense; and it is further

ORDERED that the Government Submission is hereby sealed, and shall remain preserved in the custody of the Classified Information Security Officer, in accordance with established court security procedures, until further order of this Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bradley

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
21 Cr. 277 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES BRADLEY, a/k/a “Abdullah, ” and ARWA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 20, 2022

Citations

21 Cr. 277 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)