From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bradford

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Apr 12, 2022
1:22-MJ-331-SH (W.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-MJ-331-SH

04-12-2022

United States of America, Plaintiff v. James Bradford, Defendant


ORDER

SUSAN HIGHTOWER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Now before the Court is Defendant James Bradford's Motion to Substitute Counsel, filed April 12, 2022 (Dkt. 12).

Defendant asks to substitute Viktor Olavson for Federal Public Defender Jose I. Gonzalez-Falla, who was appointed by the Court to represent Defendant. The Government does not oppose the motion.

Having considered the motion, the undersigned finds that there is good cause to permit the substitution of counsel, and that Defendant has received notice.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant James Bradford's Motion to Substitute Counsel (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED. Jose I. Gonzalez-Falla is hereby WITHDRAWN and Viktor Olavson #15241775 is SUBSTITUTED as Defendant's counsel of record.


Summaries of

United States v. Bradford

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Apr 12, 2022
1:22-MJ-331-SH (W.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Bradford

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff v. James Bradford, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division

Date published: Apr 12, 2022

Citations

1:22-MJ-331-SH (W.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 2022)