United States v. Bradford

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GARRY BRADFORD, Defendant and…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 28, 2015

2:15-mc-0022 TLN DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2015)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GARRY BRADFORD, Defendant and Judgment Debtor. No. 2:15-mc-0022 TLN DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. May 28, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         On March 16, 2015, plaintiff filed an application for a writ of garnishment. (Dkt. No. 3.) Accordingly, on March 20, 2015, the Clerk of the Court sent defendant and judgment debtor a Notice and Instructions to Judgment Debtor re: Writ of Continuing Garnishment form, which included a Claim for Exemption form and a Request for Hearing form. (Dkt. No. 4.)

         On April 9, 2015, defendant and judgment debtor filed his Claim for Exemption and Request for Hearing forms. (Dkt. No. 8.) According to those forms, however, the defendant and judgment debtor is currently incarcerated in Texas and is proceeding in this action pro se. Accordingly, the parties will file responsive briefing and the matter will thereafter be submitted on the papers. See Local Rule 203(l).

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff shall file a response to the April 8, 2015 filing (Dkt. No. 8) within 21 days of the date of this order; and

         2. Defendant and judgment debtor shall file a reply within 14 days of being served with plaintiff's response.