From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Boyles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
May 19, 2017
No. 12-40127-01-JAR (D. Kan. May. 19, 2017)

Opinion

No. 12-40127-01-JAR No. 16-4086-JAR

05-19-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DOMINIQUE LEE BOYLES, Defendant/Petitioner.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Dominique Boyle's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 118). The Government has moved to dismiss Petitioner's motion (Doc. 128). For the reasons stated below, the Government's motion is granted.

Petitioner submits that his prior state conviction for criminal threat no longer serves as a predicate crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, and in turn, prevents enhancement of the base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. United States.

576 U.S. ---, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015).

Petitioner's motion can be sustained only under circumstances where the Supreme Court of the United States finds that the advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines are subject to scrutiny on vagueness grounds and that Johnson in turn applies retroactively to the Guidelines. On March 6, 2017, however, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Beckles v. United States, holding that "the Guidelines are not subject to a vagueness challenge under the Due Process Clause, [and] [t]he residual clause in § 4B1.2(a)(2) therefore is not void for vagueness." Consequently, Johnson does not provide a retroactive gateway for Petitioner to challenge his sentence.

137 S. Ct. 886, 892 (2017). --------

Accordingly, because Petitioner's motion is founded on a vagueness challenge to a sentence imposed under the advisory Guidelines, and Beckles dictates that such an argument is unavailable to Petitioner, his motion to vacate sentence must be dismissed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the Government's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner Dominique Boyle's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 128) is GRANTED; Petitioner's § 2255 motion (Doc. 118) is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2017

S/ Julie A. Robinson

JULIE A. ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Boyles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
May 19, 2017
No. 12-40127-01-JAR (D. Kan. May. 19, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Boyles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DOMINIQUE LEE BOYLES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: May 19, 2017

Citations

No. 12-40127-01-JAR (D. Kan. May. 19, 2017)