From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Boyd

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2021
CV 18-803-MWF (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

CV 18-803-MWF (JEMx)

12-20-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JANE BOYD, Defendant.

TRACY L. WILKISON United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division JOHN D. ELLIS (Cal. Bar No. 322922) Assistant United States Attorneys Attorneys for the United States of America


TRACY L. WILKISON United States Attorney

THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division

JOHN D. ELLIS (Cal. Bar No. 322922) Assistant United States Attorneys Attorneys for the United States of America

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court, having read and considered the parties' Stipulation to Dismiss Case By Reason of Settlement (Stipulation, ECF No. 66), ORDERS that:

1. The Stipulation is in all respects APPROVED;
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice;
3. All pending scheduling dates, including the hearing on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal calendared for January 10, 2022, are VACATED;
4. The judgment entered April 23, 2019, is VACATED;
5. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees; and
6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case in order to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Boyd

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2021
CV 18-803-MWF (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JANE BOYD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

CV 18-803-MWF (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)