From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Boyce

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2021
No. 20-6996 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-6996

02-26-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANTE CORNELIUS BOYCE, Defendant - Appellant.

Dante Cornelius Boyce, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:10-cr-00092-D-1) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dante Cornelius Boyce, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dante Cornelius Boyce appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce Boyce's sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Boyce, No. 4:10-cr-00092-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2020). We deny Boyce's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Boyce

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2021
No. 20-6996 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Boyce

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANTE CORNELIUS BOYCE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 26, 2021

Citations

No. 20-6996 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021)