From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bowers

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Oct 10, 2024
3:24-CR-00040-CCB-SJF (N.D. Ind. Oct. 10, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CR-00040-CCB-SJF

10-10-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORDAN BOWERS


ORDER

CRISTAL C. BRISCO, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

The Court has reviewed the findings and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Scott J. Frankel filed September 25, 2024. Defendant Jordan Bowers pleaded guilty to the Indictment charging him with possession of a machinegun, knowing it had the characteristics of a machinegun, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). No party objected, and the time to object has passed. The Court now adopts the findings and recommendation in their entirety. The plea of guilty to this offense as charged in the Indictment is hereby accepted, and the defendant is adjudged guilty of this offense.

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bowers

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Oct 10, 2024
3:24-CR-00040-CCB-SJF (N.D. Ind. Oct. 10, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Bowers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JORDAN BOWERS

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Oct 10, 2024

Citations

3:24-CR-00040-CCB-SJF (N.D. Ind. Oct. 10, 2024)