From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Boring

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 14, 2011
CR. 2:11-CR-006 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CR. 2:11-CR-006 WBS

10-14-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD JAY BORING, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KYLE REARDON Assistant U.S. Attorney Kyle Reardon for TIMOTHY ZINDEL Attorney for the Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KYLE REARDON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

Court: Hon. William B. Shubb

The parties request that the status conference currently set for Monday, October 17, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., be continued to Monday, November 14, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., and stipulate that the time beginning October 17, 2011, and extending through November 14, 2011, should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161.

The defendant is currently held in San Joaquin County jail pending his trial on multiple counts of sexual molestation. Resolution of the federal trial will be affected by the results of the state proceeding.

In addition, Defense Counsel is currently unavailable due to medical issues.

Accordingly, the parties believe that the continuance should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The additional time is necessary to allow the current state court proceeding to conclude, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(B); and to permit continuity of counsel, id. at (7)(B)(iv). The interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: KYLE REARDON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

By: Kyle Reardon for

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Attorney for the Defendant

ORDER

The status conference in case number 2:11-CR-006 WBS, currently set for Monday, October 17, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., is continued to Monday, November 14, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., and the time beginning October 17, 2011, and extending through November 14, 2011, is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The additional time is necessary to allow the current state court proceeding to conclude, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(B); and to permit continuity of counsel, id. at (7)(B)(iv). The interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Boring

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 14, 2011
CR. 2:11-CR-006 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Boring

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD JAY BORING, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

CR. 2:11-CR-006 WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)