From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Booth

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 30, 2024
4:18-cr-247-DPM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 30, 2024)

Opinion

4:18-cr-247-DPM

08-30-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. LLOYD BOOTH Reg. No. 31971-009 DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

Booth's motion, Doc. 33, is denied without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. This is a second or successive habeas petition; and Booth must get permission from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit before this Court can proceed. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Booth relies on a Mississippi District Court decision in arguing that the felon in possession statute is unconstitutional. United States v. Bullock, 679 F.Supp.3d 501, 506 (S.D.Miss. 2023). But the Court of Appeals recently held that the statute is constitutional. United States v. Jackson, No. 22-2870, slip op. at 8-9 (8th Cir. 8 August 2024). No certificate of appealability will issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

United States v. Booth

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 30, 2024
4:18-cr-247-DPM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 30, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. LLOYD BOOTH Reg. No. 31971-009…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Aug 30, 2024

Citations

4:18-cr-247-DPM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 30, 2024)