From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bolden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2020
CASE NO. 1:19-cr-459-RAH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 22, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:19-cr-459-RAH

09-22-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MUTA BOLDEN


MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial (Doc. 144) filed by Defendant Muta Bolden on September 17, 2020. Jury selection and trial are set in this case on the term of court commencing October 19, 2020. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant a continuance of the trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

While the grant of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge, United States v. Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506, 1516 (11th Cir. 1986), the Court is limited by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (Act). The Act provides in part:

In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence within seventy days from the filing date (and making public) of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs.
18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). However, the Act excludes from the seventy-day period any continuance based on "findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." §3161(h)(7)(A). In granting such a continuance, the Court may consider, among other factors, whether the failure to grant the continuance "would deny counsel for the defendant or the attorney for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence." § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Counsel for Bolden represents that the parties are engaged in ongoing plea negotiations. In addition, he maintains that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, counsel has had difficulties meeting with the Defendant in person to discuss the possible benefits of entering a plea. The United States does not oppose a continuance.

In light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, and for good cause, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance of this trial outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. Thus, for good cause, it is

ORDERED as follows:

(1) Jury selection and trial are CONTINUED from October 19, 2020 to the criminal term of court commencing on December 7, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in
Montgomery, Alabama. All deadlines tied to the trial date are adjusted accordingly.

(2)The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to draw the names of the petit jurors randomly from the division in which the trial is held, which is the Northern Division.

(3) The United States Magistrate Judge shall conduct a pretrial conference prior to the December 2020 trial term.

DONE, this 22nd day of September, 2020.

/s/ R. Austin Huffaker, Jr.

R. AUSTIN HUFFAKER, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Bolden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2020
CASE NO. 1:19-cr-459-RAH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 22, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Bolden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MUTA BOLDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 1:19-cr-459-RAH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 22, 2020)