From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bogart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 8, 2015
Civ. No. 4:12-CV-00347 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 4:12-CV-00347

01-08-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, MARCY A. BOGART, SOUTHERN COUNTRY RANCH, Defendants.


() (Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson)

ORDER

BACKGROUND:

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the December 8, 2014 report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson (ECF No. 104). The Defendants filed an Objection (ECF Nos. 105), and the Plaintiff filed a Response (ECF No. 106). The Court reviewed the Defendant's objections under the applicable de novo standard.

Because this Court agrees with Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson's analysis and is unpersuaded by the Defendant's objections, the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Chief United States Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson' s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full (ECF No. 104)



2. Defendants motions to dismiss are DENIED (ECF Nos. 77, 95).



3. The case is remanded to Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.

BY THE COURT:

s/Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bogart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 8, 2015
Civ. No. 4:12-CV-00347 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Bogart

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, MARCY A. BOGART…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 4:12-CV-00347 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Prime Energy & Chem., LLC v. Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

The previous disposition of a motion to dismiss may constitute the law of the case. See, e.g., In re…

Ernst v. Union Cnty. Conservation Dist.

United States v. Bogart, No. 4:12-CV-347, 2014 WL 7507260, at *5 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 8, 2014) (quoting In re…