From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bogart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 4, 2012
No. 3:12-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0179

04-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, et al., Defendants


Magistrate Judge Brown


ORDER

The motion to continue the case management conference (Docket Entry 3) is GRANTED. The case management conference is reset for May 30, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., Courtroom 783.

The Magistrate Judge fails to see what the problem is in serving Defendants who show local Tennessee addresses with the complaint in this case and, at the same time, serving a Pennsylvanian complaint.

The Clerk will send a copy of the docket sheet and this Order to the named Defendants at the addresses listed in the complaint for informational purposes only. This mailing does not constitute a service of process.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

JOE B. BROWN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bogart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 4, 2012
No. 3:12-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bogart

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 4, 2012)