From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Blanco

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2021
1:17-cr-0140 DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:17-cr-0140 DAD

11-03-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACOB BLANCO, Defendant-Appellant.


ORDER GRANTING

APPELLATE COUNSEL ACCESS TO SEALED TRANSCRIPTS

[9TH CIRCUIT CASE NO. 21-10301] 1

Based on a showing of good cause, the Court grants appellate counsel Carolyn D. Phillips access to the following sealed transcripts:

1. February 5, 2018, defendant's request for new counsel heard by Magistrate Judge Oberto;
2. October 9, 2018, Marsden motion and Faretta hearing before Magistrate Judge Oberto;
3. July 15, 2019, Marsden hearing and motion for mental examination heard by Judge O'Neill;
4. January 13, 2020, Marsden hearing, before Judge O'Neill;
5. March 27, 2020, Marsden hearing, in camera before Magistrate Boone;
2
6. May 1, 2020, Faretta hearing before Judge Drozd; and,
7. May 14, 2021, Marsden hearing before Judge Drozd, reported by Karen Hooven.

Counsel is to destroy all sealed transcripts in her possession when the appeal becomes final, as measured by expiration of time to seek certiorari in the U.S. Supreme

Court or conclusion of any U.S. Supreme Court proceedings, whichever is later.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 3


Summaries of

United States v. Blanco

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2021
1:17-cr-0140 DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Blanco

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACOB BLANCO…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

1:17-cr-0140 DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)