United States v. Black

3 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Clements

    5:23-cr-01389-MIS (D.N.M. Jan. 11, 2024)

    , 2023 WL 4466507, at *2 (N.D. W.Va. July 11, 2023); United States v. Gil, EP-22-CR-773-DB, 2023 WL 4356067, at *7 (W.D. Tex. July 5, 2023); United States v. Overholser, No. 3:22-CR-35 JD, 2023 WL 4145343, at *2 (N.D. Ind. June 23, 2023); United States v. Evenson, No. CR-23-24-BLG-SPW, 2023 WL 3947828, at *2 (D. Mont. June 12, 2023); United States v. Walker, No. 8:22-CR-291, 2023 WL 3932224, at *5 (D. Neb. June 9, 2023); Costianes, 2023 WL 3550972, at *6; United States v. Parker, No. 22-CR-4072-LTS-KEM, 2023 WL 3596453, at *3 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 25, 2023); United States v. Le, No. 4:23-cr-00014-SHL-HCA, __ F.Supp.3d, 2023 WL 3016297, at *5 (S.D. Iowa Apr. 4, 2023); United States v. Stennerson, No CR 22-139-BLG-SPW, 2023 WL 2214351, at *2 (D. Mont. Feb. 24, 2023); Randall, 656 F.Supp.3d at 856; Posey, 655 F.Supp.3d at 776; United States v. Lewis, 650 F.Supp.3d 1235, 1242 (W.D. Okla. 2023); United States v. Black, 649 F.Supp.3d 246, 253 (W.D. La. 2023); Gilpin v. United States, Crim. No. 2004050-01-CR-C-RK, 2023 WL 387049, at *4 (W.D. Miss. Jan. 3 2023); United States v. Sanchez, 646 F.Supp.3d 825, 828-29 (W.D. Tex. 2022); Fried, 640 F.Supp.3d at 1263; United States v. Seiwert, No. 20-CR-443, 2022 WL 4534605, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 28, 2022); Daniels, 610 F.Supp.3d at 897, rev'd 77 F.4th 337 (5th Cir. 2023).

  2. United States v. Espinoza-Melgar

    687 F. Supp. 3d 1196 (D. Utah 2023)   Cited 9 times
    Summarizing state of the law across circuits

    s v. Beverly, Criminal No. 2:21CR36, 2023 WL 4466507 (N.D. W. Va. July 11, 2023); United States v. Gil, EP-22-CR-773-DB, 2023 WL 4356067 (W.D. Tex. July 5, 2023); United States v. Overholser, No. 3:22-CR-35 JD, 2023 WL 4145343 (N.D. Ind. June 23, 2023); United States v. Evenson, No. CR-23-24-BLG-SPW, 2023 WL 3947828 (D. Mont. June 12, 2023); United States v. Walker, No. 8:22-CR-291, 2023 WL 3932224 (D. Neb. June 9, 2023); United States v. Costianes, No. JKB-21-0458, 673 F.Supp.3d 756 (D. Md. May 18, 2023); United States v. Parker, No. 22-CR-4072-LTS-KEM, 2023 WL 3596453 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 25, 2023); United States v. Le, No. 4:23-cr-00014-SHL-HCA, 669 F.Supp.3d 754 (S.D. Iowa April 4, 2023); United States v. Stennerson, No CR 22-139-BLG-SPW, 2023 WL 2214351 (D. Mont. Feb. 24, 2023); United States v. Randall, 656 F.Supp.3d 851 (S.D. Iowa Feb. 14, 2023); United States v. Posey, 655 F.Supp.3d 762 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 9, 2023); United States v. Lewis, 650 F.Supp.3d 1235 (W.D. Okla. Jan. 13, 2023); United States v. Black, No. 22-133-01, 2074244401, 2023 WL 122920 (W.D. La. Jan. 6, 2023); Gilpin v. United States, Crim. No. 2004050-01-CR-C-RK, 2023 WL 387049 (W.D. Miss. Jan. 3 2023); United States v. Sanchez, 646 F.Supp.3d 825, 828-29 (W.D. Tex. 2022); Fried v. Garland, 640 F.Supp.3d 1252 (N.D. Fla. 2022); United States v. Seiwert, No. 20-CR-443, 2022 WL 4534605 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 28, 2022); United States v. Doty, No. 5:21-CR-21, 2022 WL 17492260 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 9, 2022); United States v. Daniels, 610 F.Supp.3d 892, 895-96 (S.D. Miss. 2022) rev'd 77 F.4th 337 (5th Cir. 2023). The court was aware of only two district courts that had thus far determined that § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional after Bruen.

  3. United States v. Rowson

    652 F. Supp. 3d 436 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)   Cited 27 times
    Rejecting a similar argument

    constitutional facially and as-applied); United States v. Carrero, No. 22 Cr. 0030 (RHC), 635 F.Supp.3d 1210, 1212-15 (D. Utah Oct. 14, 2022) (same; Bruen did not supersede Tenth Circuit precedent holding § 922(g)(1) constitutional); United States v. Butts, No. Cr. 22 Cr. 33 (DWM), 637 F.Supp.3d 1134, 1137-38 (D. Mont. Oct. 31, 2022) (§ 922(g)(1) constitutional); and United States v. Garrett, No. 18 CR 880, 650 F.Supp.3d 638, 640-42 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 11, 2023) (same, noting that 58 other decisions had upheld § 922(n) since Bruen as of the Government opposition brief). For challenges to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which prohibits the possession by unlawful "user[s] of or addict[s] to any controlled substance," see United States v. Daniels, No. 22 Cr. 58 (LG), 610 F.Supp.3d 892, 896-97 (S.D. Miss. July 8, 2022) (§ 922(g)(3) constitutional); United States v. Sanchez, No. 21 Cr. 0213 (ADA), 646 F.Supp.3d 825, 828-29 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 2022) (same); and United States v. Black, No. 22 Cr. 133-01, 649 F.Supp.3d 246, 252-54 (W.D. La. Jan. 6, 2023) (same).For challenges to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits persons subject to certain court-issued restraining orders from possessing a firearm, see United States v. Haas, No. 22-5054, 2022 WL 15048667, at *2 & n.1 (10th Cir. Oct. 27, 2022) (refuting argument that § 922(g)(8) was unconstitutional, but not specifically deciding question); and Kays, 624 F.Supp.3d at 1266-68 (§ 922(g)(8) constitutional after Bruen).