United States v. Black

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRIUS BLACK, JR.

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

1:22-mj-01015-MJS (D.N.J. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-mj-01015-MJS

01-20-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRIUS BLACK, JR.

HONORABLE MATTHEW J. SKAHILL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

HONORABLE MATTHEW J. SKAHILL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That tile Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other: