Opinion
5:22-cr-79-JA-PRL
03-08-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID LEE BISHOP
United States Attorney Counsel for Defendant David Lee Bishop
United States Attorney
Counsel for Defendant
David Lee Bishop
ORDER
JOHN ANTOON II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This case is before the Court on the Motion to Suppress (Doc. 46) filed by Defendant. The assigned United States Magistrate Judge Lammens has submitted a Report (Doc. 85) recommending that the motion be denied. Defendant has filed an Objection to the Report (Doc. 97) and the Government has filed a Response (Doc. 98).
After review of the record in this matter, including consideration of the Objection and Response, the Court agrees with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. The Court further emphasizes that as to the first confession, the reasoning in United States v. Conley, 779 F.2d 970 (4th Cir. 1985) was adopted by Garcia v. Singletary, 13 F.3d 1487 (11th Cir. 1994). Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 85) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The Motion to Suppress (Doc. 46) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED