From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bishop

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Feb 17, 1961
191 F. Supp. 160 (E.D. Wis. 1961)

Opinion

Nos. 59-CR-52, 59-CR-139.

February 17, 1961.

Edward G. Minor, U.S. Atty., by Matthew M. Corry, Asst. U.S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Julius Lucius Echeles, Chicago, Ill., for defendants Jacob Louis Shubow and Eugene Philip Gillis.

Adrian B. Fink, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, and John H. Wessel, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants Irving Isadore Lichterman and Daniel Edward Wigodski.


Plaintiff, United States of America, has moved for a rehearing of the matters considered in this court's decision and order of December 6, 1960, 188 F. Supp. 804. The defendants, Irving Isadore Lichterman, Daniel Edward Wigodski, Jacob Louis Shubow, and Eugene Philip Gillis, have made a motion to dismiss the motion of the plaintiff for rehearing.

The matter was submitted on briefs. The court has carefully considered the material submitted and finds no basis for granting any rehearing. The court is of the opinion that this matter is squarely governed by Napue v. People of State of Illinois, 1959, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217.

The motion for rehearing is hereby denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Bishop

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Feb 17, 1961
191 F. Supp. 160 (E.D. Wis. 1961)
Case details for

United States v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. James Hurley BISHOP, alias James B…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Feb 17, 1961

Citations

191 F. Supp. 160 (E.D. Wis. 1961)