From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Birdsong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Jan 27, 2015
Case No. 1:03-cr-170-CLC-WBC (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:03-cr-170-CLC-WBC

01-27-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORNELIUS LOVETT BIRDSONG


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CORNELIUS LOVETT BIRDSONG ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on January 22, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included:

(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government;
(2) Supervised Releasee; and
(3) An Attorney with Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee ("FDS") for the Supervised Releasee.

After being sworn in due form of law, Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It was determined that Supervised Releasee wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. FDS was appointed to represent Supervised Releasee. It was also determined that Supervised Releasee had been provided with and reviewed with counsel a copy of the Petition.

The Government moved that Supervised Releasee be detained without bail pending his revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier. Supervised Releasee requested both a preliminary hearing and a detention hearing, which were held.

Preliminary Examination and Detention Hearing Proof

AUSA Piper called U.S. Probation Officer Shaquana Kennedy as a witness to testify about the factual allegations set forth in the Petition and called Deputy U.S. Marshal Jason Ladd as a witness to testify about the circumstances of Supervised Releasee's arrest the morning of January 22, 2015. Attorney Marsa cross-examined the government's witnesses, made a proffer, and called the Supervised Releasee as a witness to testify on his own behalf. Both parties presented their respective arguments, which were fully considered by the Court.

Findings


(1) Based upon the evidence, which was consistent with the facts set forth in the Petition, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe Supervised Releasee has committed a violation of a condition of his supervised release.



(2) Supervised Releasee has not carried his burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that, if released, he would not pose a danger to another person or to the community or pose a risk of flight under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6).

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) Supervised Releasee shall appear for a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Collier.



(2) The Government's motion that supervised releasee be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.



(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. [EASTERN].

SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

/s/_________

SUSAN K. LEE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Birdsong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Jan 27, 2015
Case No. 1:03-cr-170-CLC-WBC (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Birdsong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORNELIUS LOVETT BIRDSONG

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:03-cr-170-CLC-WBC (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 27, 2015)