Opinion
7:23-CR-40-WLS-TQL-1
09-15-2023
ORDER
W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Before the Court is the Defendant's Second Motion to Continue Trial (Doc. 49) (“Motion”). Therein, Defense Counsel requests a continuance of the trial of this matter from the Valdosta November 2023 trial term to the next Valdosta trial term. Defense Counsel requests the continuance due to recent and unforeseen exacerbation of certain health conditions from which Defense Counsel suffers as well as the resulting need to seek related medical treatment. Defense Counsel needs additional time to complete his investigation and preparation for trial in the above captioned case. Defense Counsel states that the failure to grant a continuance would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and resolution of legal issues, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Defendant requests that the period of this delay be excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act.
Based on the Defendant's stated reasons, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A)-(B). Therefore, the Motion (Doc. 49) is GRANTED.
The Court hereby ORDERS that the trial in the above-referenced matter be CONTINUED to the Valdosta Division February 2024 trial term and its conclusion, or as may otherwise be ordered by the Court. Furthermore, it is ORDERED that the time lost under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, is EXCLUDED pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) because the Court has continued the trial in this case and finds that the failure to grant a continuance (a) would likely result in a miscarriage of justice, and (b) would deny Defense Counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), (iv).
SO ORDERED,