Opinion
Crim. Action No.: 1:18CR25
09-23-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PARTH BHARILL, Defendant.
( ) ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE [DKT. NO. 83] , ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING
On September 3, 2019, the Defendant, Parth Bharill ("Bharill"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count One of the Indictment. Bharill stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, and Bharill consented to pleading before the magistrate judge. This Court referred Defendant's plea of guilty to the magistrate judge for the purpose of administering the allocution, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.
Based upon Defendant Bharill's statements during the plea hearing, and the Government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Defendant Bharill was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") [Dkt. No. 83] finding a factual basis for the plea, and recommending that this Court accept Defendant Bharill's plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment.
The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. Neither the Defendant nor the Government filed objections to the R&R.
Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R [Dkt. No. 83], provisionally ACCEPTS Defendant Bharill's guilty plea, and ADJUDGES him GUILTY of the crime charged in Count One of the Indictment.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence investigation report prepared in this matter.
Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS the following:
1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Bharill, and prepare a presentence investigation report for the Court;
2. The Government and Defendant Bharill shall each provide their narrative descriptions of the offense to the Probation Officer by September 30, 2019;
3. The presentence investigation report shall be disclosed to Defendant Bharill, counsel for Defendant, and the Government on or before November 29, 2019; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);
4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence investigation report on or before December 13, 2019;
5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence investigation report with addendum to the Court on or before December 20, 2019; and
6. Counsel may file any written sentencing memorandum or statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis for the same, on or before January 6, 2020.
The magistrate judge released Defendant Bharill on the terms of the Order Setting Conditions of Release [Dkt. No. 11-3] filed on May 15, 2018.
The Court will conduct the Sentencing Hearing for Defendant Bharill on Thursday, January 30, 2020, at 1:30 P.M., at the Clarksburg, West Virginia point of holding court.
It is so ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies. DATED: September 23, 2019
/s/ Thomas S. Kleeh
THOMAS S. KLEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE