From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Betancourt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO. 8:O3-cr-0l-T-17MAP (M.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:O3-cr-0l-T-17MAP

10-04-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GUSTAVO VIVAS BETANCOURT.


ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before tins Court on Defendant's, Gustavo Vivas Betancourt, Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. 336). Defendant's Motion fails to identify any United States Sentencing Guidelines Amendment applicable to Defendant's case. Assuming arguendo that Defendant is referring to the retroactive application of amendments relating to cocaine base, the Defendant's sentence was not based in any part on the quantity of cocaine base.

As such, this Court agrees with the government. The United Slates Sentencing Guidelines Amendment involving cocaine base docs not apply in the Defendant's case. Accordingly, it is:

ORDERED that Defendant's, Gustavo Vivas Betancourt, Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc, 336) is DENIED

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 4th day of October, 2011.

ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH

United States District Judge

Copies to: All parties and counsel of record.


Summaries of

United States v. Betancourt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO. 8:O3-cr-0l-T-17MAP (M.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Betancourt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GUSTAVO VIVAS BETANCOURT.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 8:O3-cr-0l-T-17MAP (M.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2011)