From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Besser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 19, 2013
No. CR 12-00875 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-00875 WHA

03-19-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACQUELINE BESSER Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division JONATHAN SCHMIDT (CABN 230646) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
JONATHAN SCHMIDT (CABN 230646)
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND

EXCLUDING TIME

The parties are scheduled to appear on March 19, 2013. The parties request a continuance of two weeks to April 2, 2013. The parties are in plea discussions and several issues that require detailed review a economic documents have emerged. The parties anticipate that these issues will be clarified by April 2, 2013 and on that date the parties will have reached a plea agreement or ask the Court to set a trial date. The parties also ask that the time between March 19, 2013 and April 2, 2013 be excluded in calculating the time within which a trial must begin. Exclusion of time is appropriate because of the need for the parties to review documents. Failure to exclude time would deny the defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(B)(7)(iv)). SO STIPULATED

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

________________________

JONATHAN SCHMIDT

Assistant United States Attorney

________________________

MARTHA A. BOERSCH

Attorney for Defendant

[Proposed] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the status date set for March 19, 2013 is continued to April 2, 2013 and the time from March 19, 2013, to April 2, 2013 is excluded in calculating the time within which a trial must begin. (18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(B)(7)(iv)).

IT IS SO ORDERED

________________________

WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Besser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 19, 2013
No. CR 12-00875 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Besser

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACQUELINE BESSER Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-00875 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)