From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bernhardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Aug 17, 2016
CR 16-05-H-DLC (D. Mont. Aug. 17, 2016)

Opinion

CR 16-05-H-DLC

08-17-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIN MARIE BERNHARDT, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute, and conspiring to distribute, methamphetamine and Suboxone in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 as set forth in Count I of the Superseding Information. Defendant also entered a plea of guilty to accepting a bribe as an agent of the State of Montana in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) as set forth in Count II of the Superseding Information. In exchange for Defendant's pleas, the United States has agreed to dismiss Counts I - V of the Indictment, and Counts I -V of the Superseding Indictment.

After examining the Defendant under oath, I have made the following determinations:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering informed and voluntary pleas,

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges against her and consequences of pleading guilty to the charges,

3. That the Defendant fully understands her constitutional rights, and the extent to which she is waiving those rights by pleading guilty, and

4. That the pleas of guilty are knowing and voluntary pleas, supported by an independent basis in fact sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the offenses charged.

The Court further concludes that the Defendant had adequate time to review the Plea Agreement with counsel, that she fully understands each and every provision of the agreement, and that all of the statements in the Plea Agreement are true. Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the two offenses charged in the Superseding Information, and that sentence be imposed. I further recommend that Counts I - V of the Indictment, and Counts I - V of the Superseding Indictment be dismissed.

This report is forwarded with the recommendation that the Court defer a decision regarding acceptance until the Court has reviewed the Plea Agreement and the presentence report.

DATED this 17th day of August, 2016.

/s/_________

Jeremiah C. Lynch

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bernhardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Aug 17, 2016
CR 16-05-H-DLC (D. Mont. Aug. 17, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Bernhardt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIN MARIE BERNHARDT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 17, 2016

Citations

CR 16-05-H-DLC (D. Mont. Aug. 17, 2016)