Opinion
CRIM. 21-900
04-10-2023
ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS
HONORABLE SUSAN D. WIGENTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:
[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and
[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:
(1) the on-going COVID-19 pandemic; (2) Defendant's specific desire to proceed with this plea hearing remotely to advance the resolution of this case; and (3) consent of Defendant.
Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:
[√] Video Teleconferencing
[√] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:
[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.
[] Other: