Opinion
22-4732
02-28-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL RAFAEL BERKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Michael Rafael Berkley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 10, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:22-cr-00101-MHL-1)
Michael Rafael Berkley, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Michael Rafael Berkley appeals the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order directing that Berkley be detained pending resolution of the criminal charges against him.[*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Clark, 865 F.2d 1433, 1437 (4th Cir. 1989) (citing standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Berkley, No. 3:22-cr-00101-MHL-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[*] We have jurisdiction to review the district court's order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).