From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bergess

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 8, 2015
CR 15-00195 VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)

Opinion

          STEVEN G. KALAR, Federal Public Defender, SHILPI AGARWAL, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, Rita Lin, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Defendant Anthony Bergess.


          [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

          VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

         The above-entitled matter is currently scheduled for a Change of Plea/Trial Setting Conference on June 23, 2015 at 1:00 pm. See Doc. No. 7. The parties jointly request that, subject to the Court's approval, this hearing be continued by two weeks, until July 7, 2015 at 1:00 pm.

         The parties made their initial appearance before this Court on May 5, 2015. At that conference, the parties informed the Court that their discussions regarding a possible resolution to this matter would benefit from a pre-plea presentence report. The Court according requested such a report from the Probation Office. The parties expect to receive that report around mid-June.

         Counsel for the defendant recently had a trial set for June 22, 2015. Counsel expects the trial to last anywhere from one week to ten days. In order to ensure that the parties can review the pre-plea presentence report and meaningfully discuss a possible resolution in this matter before the next appearance before this Court, defense counsel requests that the status conference be continued for two weeks. Defense counsel has conferred with the counsel for the government, who has no objection to this request. Accordingly, the parties request that upcoming Change of Plea/Trial Setting Conference be continued from June 23, 2015 to July 7, 2015.

         This continuance will allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and continuity of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. As such, the parties also respectfully request that the time between June 23, 2015 and July 7, 2015 be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bergess

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 8, 2015
CR 15-00195 VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Bergess

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY BERGESS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jun 8, 2015

Citations

CR 15-00195 VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)