From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bennett

United States District Court, District of Montana
Aug 27, 2024
CR 18-48-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

CR 18-48-BLG-SPW

08-27-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LIONEL DUANE BENNETT, Defendant.


ORDER

SUSAN P. WATTERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant moved, pro se, to early terminate his supervised release. (Doc. 39). The Government did not respond. In communications with the Court, Defendant's probation officer Michael Chism did not object to early termination. Chism noted that Defendant has been violation-free during his supervised release, maintained employment with a local construction company, and generally appears to have settled into a law-abiding life.

As such, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2), and good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Lionel Duane Bennett's supervised release is terminated as of the date of this Order.

The Clerk shall forthwith notify the parties and the U.S. Probation Office of the making of this Order.


Summaries of

United States v. Bennett

United States District Court, District of Montana
Aug 27, 2024
CR 18-48-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LIONEL DUANE BENNETT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

CR 18-48-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)